Office of Internal Auditing The Office of Internal Auditing OIA at the University of North Florida is an independent appraisal function which was established to examine and evaluate University activities as a service to management and stakeholders. Our mission is to provide an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity that will add value and improve UNF's operations.
IIA Guidance - Independence and Objectivity The internal audit activity must be independent, and internal auditors must be objective in performing their work. Interpretation Independence is the freedom from conditions that threaten the ability of the internal audit activity to carry out internal audit responsibilities in an unbiased manner.
To achieve the degree of independence necessary to effectively carry out the responsibilities of the internal audit activity, the chief audit executive has direct and unrestricted access to senior management and the board. This can be achieved through a dual-reporting relationship.
Threats to independence must be managed at the individual auditor, engagement, functional, and organizational levels. Objectivity is an unbiased mental attitude that allows internal auditors to perform engagements in such a manner that they believe in their work product and that no quality compromises are made.
Objectivity requires that internal auditors do not subordinate their judgment on audit matters to others. Threats to objectivity must be managed at the individual auditor, engagement, functional, and organizational levels.
The chief audit executive must confirm to the board, at least annually, the organizational independence of the internal audit activity. Interpretation Organizational independence is effectively achieved when the chief audit executive reports functionally to the board.
Examples of functional reporting to the board involve the board: A1 - The internal audit activity must be free from interference in determining the scope of internal auditing, performing work, and communicating results. Interpretation Conflict of interest is a situation in which an internal auditor, who is in a position of trust, has a competing professional or personal interest.
Such competing interests can make it difficult to fulfill his or her duties impartially. A conflict of interest exists even if no unethical or improper act results. A conflict of interest can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the internal auditor, the internal audit activity, and the profession.
A conflict of interest could impair an individual's ability to perform his or her duties and responsibilities objectively. Individual Objectivity January - Impairment to Independence or Objectivity Standard If independence or objectivity is impaired in fact or appearance, the details of the impairment must be disclosed to appropriate parties.
The nature of the disclosure will depend upon the impairment. Interpretation Impairment of organizational independence and individual objectivity may include, but is not limited to, personal conflict of interest, scope limitations, restrictions on access to records, personnel, and properties, and resource limitations, such as funding.
The determination of appropriate parties to which the details of an impairment to independence or objectivity must be disclosed is dependent upon the expectations of the internal audit activity's and the chief audit executive's responsibilities to senior management and the board as described in the internal audit charter, as well as the nature of the impairment.
A1 - Internal auditors must refrain from assessing specific operations for which they were previously responsible. A2 - Assurance engagements for functions over which the chief audit executive has responsibility must be overseen by a party outside the internal audit activity.
C1 - Internal auditors may provide consulting services relating to operations for which they had previous responsibilities. C2 - If internal auditors have potential impairments to independence or objectivity relating to proposed consulting services, disclosure must be made to the engagement client prior to accepting the engagement.International Standard on Auditing (ISA) , Using the Work of Internal Auditors was revised and published in This standard focuses on whether the external auditor can use the work of the internal audit function for purposes of audit, and the revised version of the standard, clarified whether.
Summary Table of Contents Roles of the Auditor and the Internal Auditors Obtaining an Understanding of the Internal Audit Function Assessing the Competence and Objectivity of the Internal .
While the FRC’s Guidance on Audit Committees is more specific about the relationship between internal audit and the audit committee, there are areas that need to be strengthened, such as giving examples of indicators of independence and objectivity, including the audit committee or its chair playing a direct role in the remuneration and.
objectivity within the context of internal auditing and to suggest topics for future research. Internal auditing as a profession is described and within that context the importance of independence of the internal audit function and objectivity of internal auditors is discussed.
Objectivity requires that internal auditors do not subordinate their judgment on audit matters to others." In the final analysis, while we as internal audit professionals may not be independent of the organization, we must nonetheless maintain our objectivity when conducting our work.
Broad field, great answers to the questions in screening and behavioral interview. Audit is a broad field, and it is impossible to list all technical questions you can theoretically get in your interview.. Either you understand your job, or you you will struggle with the technical questions..
What you can prepare for, however, are the questions you will face in the screening and behavioral.